{}const=>[]async()letfn</>var
BackendDevelopment

Serverless vs. classic backend — who won in 2025?

Who is faster, cheaper and easier — without servers or the old-fashioned way? We analyze the pros and cons of each approach with examples and tips on when and what to use.

К

Kodik

Author

2 min read

Until recently, servers were rented, configured, and maintained manually. Then came Docker, Kubernetes and CI/CD. And now — Serverless: you just write a function, and it runs when you need it. No servers, no updates, and no sleepless nights.

Sounds perfect. But is that the case in practice in 2025?

Let's figure out whether it is worth switching to Serverless, who the classic backend is suitable for, and why many companies use both approaches at the same time 👇

🧠 In short: what is the point

Approach

What is it?

🧱 Classic backend

Server application running continuously. Often on Node, Python, Java, Go.

☁️ Serverless

Code as a function (FaaS) that runs only on request. No servers.

🔥 100,000+ students already with us

Tired of reading theory?
Time to code!

Kodik — an app where you learn to code through practice. AI mentor, interactive lessons, real projects.

🤖 AI 24/7
🎓 Certificates
💰 Free
🚀 Start learning
Joined today

⚙️ Example: how an API request works

Step

Classic backend

Serverless

User sends a request

The server receives and processes

Function is loading, executing

The code is stored on

Virtual machine / container

Cloud platform (AWS Lambda, Cloud Functions, etc.)

Payment

During server operation (always)

Only for calls

📊 Comparison of approaches

Parameter

Classic backend

Serverless

💸 Cost

Fixed, depends on the load

Paying for calls may be more profitable

⚡ Speed

Always "warm", the response is stable

Cold start possible

📦 Ease of deployment

Requires DevOps skills

Usually 1 command or CI

🧩 Flexibility

Full control

There are platform restrictions

🛠 Scalability

Manual setup required

Scales automatically

📁 Long processes, cron

No problem

Requires workarounds (for example, through queues)

🧠 Local development

Full

Need to emulate the platform

🕹 Where does Serverless really win?

  • Prototypes, MVPs and startups 🚀

  • Event calculation logic (file download, payment, email)

  • Applications without constant load

  • Processing queues, webhooks

  • When automatic scalability is important

🧱 And where is the classic better?

  • If you need a stable response without delay

  • If there are many background tasks

  • When the app is running 24/7

  • If a complex architecture is being built

  • When you need full control over the infrastructure

🤯 What changed in 2025?

  • Serverless has become easier: SDK, templates, less pain with debugging

  • The classic backend has become a DevOps machine: CI, microservices, auto-deploy

  • Frameworks (Next.js, Nuxt, Remix) support hybrid architecture

  • Multi-runtime: part of the code on the server, part — Serverless

🔮 Who won?

No one. Flexibility wins: you can combine both approaches and use the best of each.

"Business logic on Serverless, heavy API and tasks on a regular backend."

In our projects, you write the backend both manually (Node, Python) and Serverless functions. You learn to choose an approach for the task — and not because it is a "trend".

💬 Have you tried Serverless yet? Or do you prefer full control? Tell us in the comments!

🎯Stop procrastinating

Liked the article?
Time to practice!

In Kodik, you don't just read — you write code immediately. Theory + practice = real skills.

Instant practice
🧠AI explains code
🏆Certificate

No registration • No card